AGU press release highlights research from Birkeland Centre for Space Science

Read the press release at
University of Bergen press release (in Norwegian)


New study presents surprising explanation for differences in southern and northern lights

For many years, scientists assumed the aurora seen around the north pole was identical to the aurora seen around the south pole. The poles are connected by magnetic field lines and auroral displays are caused by charged particles streaming along these field lines. Because the charged particles follow these field lines, it would make sense that the auroras would be mirror images of each other.

Since 2004, researchers at the University of Bergen have been working on characterizing and understanding how and why the auroras in the northern and southern hemispheres are not similar. In 2009, Laundal and Østgaard (Nature, 2009) discovered that auroras can look completely different around the north pole and the south pole, including having different shapes and occurring at different locations – a phenomenon called asymmetry.

Now, a new study in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, a publication of the American Geophysical Union, explains how this asymmetry comes about and causes the differences in auroral displays near the Earth’s poles. The new research, which is a continuation of a series of BCSS papers by Tenfjord et al. (2015, 2016, 2018), finds the differences in aurora are likely caused by squeezing of the Earth’s magnetotail – a magnetic tail that extends away from our planet – by the solar wind and the Sun’s magnetic field. BCSS researchers have also confirmed several of the features that this new understanding predicts, like asymmetric plasma flows in the ionosphere (Reistad et al., 2016, 2018) and asymmetric current patterns in the two hemsipheres (Laundal et al., 2018).


A larger version of this video can be seen here.


When the solar magnetic field arriving at the Earth is pointing in an east-west direction, it interacts with the Earth’s magnetic field differently in the north and in the south. This leads to asymmetric loading of pressure onto the Earth’s magnetic field and introduces a tilt in the Earth’s magnetic field on the nightside of the Earth. The tilt explains why aurora can sometimes have different shapes and occur in different locations in the two polar regions.

The new finding contradicts previous theories about asymmetry, which suggested that it was caused by the pulling apart and reconnecting of magnetic field lines in the Earth’s magnetic tail, a process called tail reconnection. The new study finds that, in fact, tail reconnection reduces this asymmetry.

“The reason this is exciting is that earlier, we have thought that the asymmetry in the system enters the magnetosphere by a mechanism called tail reconnection,” said Anders Ohma, a PhD candidate at the University of Bergen in Norway, and lead author of the new study. “What this paper shows is that it’s possible that it is actually the opposite: This reconnection in the magnetotail is actually reducing the asymmetry.”



Not only does the new research explain why the northern and southern lights appear different in the night sky, but it also helps scientists better understand interactions between the Earth and the Sun. This knowledge is important for accurately predicting the location and timing of space weather events, which can create havoc for our electricity grids, satellites and astronauts in space.

From Ohma et al., 2018: one panel in Figure 3 showing how asymmetric the auroras are at substorm onset (left)– and how they then become symmetric (right) due to tail reconnection during the substorm expansion phase after. (Courtesy JGR)


A related paper in the journal Annales Geophysicae details the asymmetry seen during a geomagnetic storm in August of 2001, and demonstrates the importance of considering geospace, or the interactions between the Sun and Earth, as an asymmetric system.


From Østgaard et al., 2018: part of Figure 3 showing auroral features (circled) from the two hemispheres that are displaced as much as 4 magnetic local time hours during a magnetic storm in August 2001.


“Without including these asymmetries, our understanding of the Sun-Earth system will be far from complete and models will not be able to accurately predict the location and timing of geospace phenomena,” said Nikolai Østgaard, professor and head of the Birkeland Centre for Space Science at the University of Bergen in Norway, and lead author of the study in Annales Geophysicae.


Generating aurora

Earth’s core generates a magnetic field extending into outer space around our planet, forming a magnetic shield called the magnetosphere that protects the Earth from charged particles coming off of the Sun. The Sun emits its own magnetic field, called the interplanetary magnetic field, or IMF, that is carried by the solar wind and interacts with Earth’s magnetic field.

During certain conditions, on the dayside of Earth, the Sun’s interplanetary magnetic field lines and the Earth’s magnetic field lines can be ripped apart and cross, connecting Earth’s magnetic field to the IMF. The solar wind flowing from the Sun moves these crossed field lines to the nightside of Earth and stretches it into a tail – called the magnetotail – that extends away from the Earth.

Eventually, these crossed field lines are pulled apart and the Earth field lines rejoin with Earth field lines, and the IMF field lines rejoin with IMF field lines. Once the field lines are closed, they snap back towards Earth, accelerating particles nearby and causing auroral displays in the Earth’s upper atmosphere.


Aurora borealis, Lofoten islands, Norway (Image: Colourbox)


Because these field lines may not be the field lines originally connected to each other, scientists thought these new field lines may not be symmetrically aligned, and could be twisted and connected back to Earth in different locations in the northern and southern hemisphere. They thought it was this tail reconnection that caused the differences in aurora in the northern and southern hemispheres.

But, the new research shows this is not the case. The new study examined multiple images of asymmetric aurora in the northern and southern hemispheres at the same time and how these auroras evolved over time, so they could see the same phenomenon happening over and over. Then they related it to activity in the magnetotail.

The new study shows auroral asymmetry is reduced as tail reconnection progresses. Further, the asymmetry persists even if little to no reconnection occurs. So, the new study shows, tail reconnection is not responsible for the asymmetry.

Instead, the new research finds it is differences in pressure being exerted on the magnetotail that cause these auroral differences. The magnetotail is being constantly squeezed by the solar wind and IMF, and it is this non-uniform squeezing on it from different directions that is causing the differences in auroral displays at the two poles. The squeezing depends on the orientation of the IMF.

“This study explains both how asymmetries are created and how they are removed and it is exactly opposite of what I and many researchers have thought,“ said Mike Liemohn, editor-in-chief of JGR-Space Physics. “Therefore, this result is kind of big deal.”



  • Laundal, K. M., C. C. Finlay, N. Olsen, and J. P. Reistad (2018), Solar Wind and Seasonal Influence on Ionospheric Currents From Swarm and CHAMP Measurements, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., doi: 10.1029/2018JA025387
  • Ohma, A., N. Østgaard, J. P. Reistad , P. Tenfjord , K. M. Laundal , K. Snekvik , S. E. Haaland , M. O. Fillingim (2018), Evolution of Asymmetrically Displaced Footpoints During Substorms, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys.,
  • Reistad, J.P., N. Østgaard, K. M. Laundal, A. Ohma, K. Snekvik, P. Tenfjord, A. Grocott, K. Oksavik, S. E. Milan (2018) Observations of Asymmetries in Ionospheric Return Flow During Different Levels of Geomagnetic Activity, J. Geophsy. Res.: Space Phys., doi: 10.1002/2017JA025051
  • Reistad, J. P., N. Østgaard, P. Tenfjord, K. M. Laundal, K. Snekvik, S. Haaland, S. E. Milan, K. Oksavik, H. U. Frey, and A. Grocott (2016), Dynamic effects of restoring footpoint symmetry on closed magnetic field lines, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., doi: 10.1002/2015JA022058
  • Tenfjord, P., N. Østgaard, S. Haaland, K. Snekvik, K. M. Laundal, J. P. Reistad,R. Strangeway, S. E. Milan, M. Hesse, and A. Ohma (2018), How the IMF By Induces a Local By Component During Northward IMF Bz and Characteristic Timescales, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., doi: 10.1002/2018JA025186
  • Tenfjord, P., N. Østgaard, R. Strangeway, S. Haaland, K. Snekvik, K. M. Laundal, J. P. Reistad, and S. E. Milan (2016), Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Magnetospheric response and reconfiguration times following IMF By reversals, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., doi: 10.1002/2016JA023018
  • Tenfjord, P., N. Østgaard, K. Snekvik, K. M. Laundal, J. P. Reistad, S. Haaland, and S. E. Milan (2015), How the IMF By induces a By component in the closed magnetosphere and how it leads to asymmetric currents and convection patterns in the two hemispheres, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., doi: 10.1002/2015JA021579
  • Østgaard, N., J.P. Reistad, P. Tenfjord, K. M. Laundal, T. Rexer, S. E. Haaland, K. Snekvik, M. Hesse, S. E. Milan, and A. Ohma (2018), The asymmetric geospace as displayed during the geomagnetic storm on 17 August 2001, Annales Geophysicae,